Research on the Coupling Mechanism and Value Logic of Integrating Moral Education into Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education

Honghao Wu

doi:10.63944/21n2.JIE

Research on the Coupling Mechanism and Value Logic of Integrating Moral Education into Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education

Honghao Wu (Primary Contact)

School of Smart Agriculture, Yancheng Agricultural College, China

DOI:https://doi.org/10.63944/21n2.JIE

Keywords:

Moral education, Innovation and entrepreneurship education, Coupling mechanism, Value logic

Published

30-12-2025

Abstract: This study focuses on the core issue of the deep integration of moral education and innovation and entrepreneurship education. Based on systems theory and value theory, combined with the practical needs of talent cultivation under the innovation driven development strategy, it explores the internal logic and implementation path of the coupling between the two. By constructing a three-layer coupling mechanism model of “value knowledge action”, this paper analyzes the three value bases of goal isomorphism, process complementarity, and content symbiosis, and selects the “Internet plus” college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship competition red tourism project, and a college integration curriculum system as typical cases for empirical testing. Research has found that the coupling of moral education and innovation and entrepreneurship education is an organic unity of “soul” and “body”, which needs to be deeply integrated through four strategies: top-level design, curriculum innovation, teacher construction, and evaluation reform, ultimately providing theoretical support and practical guidance for cultivating compound innovative talents with both morality and talent.

References

[1] Lackéus M. Comparing the impact of three different experiential approaches to entrepreneurship in education[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 2023, 26(5): 937-971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0236
[2] Bacq S, Janssen F. The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria[J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2022, 23(5-6): 373-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.577242
[3] Neck H M, Corbett A C. The scholarship of teaching and learning entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 2024, 1(1): 8-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127417737286
[4] Miller T L, Grimes M G, McMullen J S, et al. Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2022, 37(4): 616-640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0456
[5] Hemingway C A. Personal values as a catalyst for corporate social entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2025, 60(3): 233-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0132-5
[6] Strachan G. Can education for sustainable development change entrepreneurship education to deliver a sustainable future?[J]. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 2024, 9(1): 36-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2018-0003
[7] Liguori E, Winkler C, Winkel D, et al. The entrepreneurship education imperative: Introducing the EE&P philosophy[J]. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 2023, 2(3): 157-163.
[8] Shepherd D A, Patzelt H, Baron R A. “I care about nature, but...”: Disengaging values in assessing opportunities that cause harm[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2023, 56(5): 1251-1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0776

Research on the Coupling Mechanism and Value Logic of Integrating Moral Education into Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education

How to Cite