Research on the path evolution and policy of China's agricultural products export to countries along the Belt and Road

Dongsheng Liao; Xi Chen

doi:10.63944/ebn.JFEMR

Research on the path evolution and policy of China's agricultural products export to countries along the Belt and Road

Dongsheng Liao (Author)

School of Management, Guangxi Minzu University, Guangxi, China

Xi Chen (Author)

School of International Economics and Trade, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, China

DOI:https://doi.org/10.63944/ebn.JFEMR

Keywords:

Belt and Road, agriculture products, export trade, fs QCA

Supporting Agencies:

Guangxi Social Science Fund Project "Research on the Mechanism and Practice of Industrial Clusters in Pinglu Canal Economic Belt" (Approval No. 24JLF004); Major Project of Guangxi Education Science "14th Five Year Plan" for 2025 (Approval No. 2025JD30). Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Approval No. KYCX25_2087).

Published

15-09-2025

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to examine the joint effect of China on the influencing factors of agricultural products export along the Belt and Road (B&R) and the evolution of its path. We selected 50 countries along the B&R as research samples. By integrating the influencing factors of export scale and introducing fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The results show that: (1) population size, economic scale, trade facilitation, institutional environment and geographical distance are not the necessary conditions for the path of China's agricultural export trade to countries along the B&R. (2) after comparing the analysis results in 2013 and 2019, it is found that the high path of China's agricultural export trade to the B&R is relatively stable. However, the negative impact of geographical distance on one of the paths is significantly weakened, while the positive effect of the level of trade facilitation is gradually significant. (3) the not-high path of China's agricultural export trade to countries along the B&R is unstable and more complex. The weak market demand drive caused by the small economic scale and small population size is still an essential factor in the less path. Finally, based on the above research conclusions, We put forward policy implications for the sustainable development of China's agricultural export trade to countries along the B&R.

References

[1] Li, Y., Zhao, T., & Yao, X. ( 2024). Does the Belt and Road Initiative upgrade the global value chain for BRI Countries: Revealing the substantial role of infrastructure. International Review of Economics & Finance, 89: 832-842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.10.046
[2] Mu, X., Zhan, Q., & Zeng, X. (2024). Can friend-shoring policies improve export resilience? A study based on the Belt and Road initiative. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96: 103535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103535
[3] Dai, W. S. (2025). Belt and Road Initiative: Driving innovation in tech enterprises through global value chains. Finance Research Letters, 74: 106796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.106796
[4] Li, W., & Yang, F. (2019). The influencing factors and trade efficiency of China's agricultural products export to the countries along the Silk Road Economic Belt：Based on stochastic frontier gravity model. Journal of international Trade, (7): 100-112(in Chinese).
[5] Cao, A., Wang, J., & Huang, R. (2018). Estimation of the effeciency and potential of agricultural products export trade between China and the "Belt and Road" countries. Statistics & Decision, (10): 113-117(in Chinese).
[6] Liu, H., & Wang, M. (2017). The Influence of institutional environment on the efficiency of China's agricultural products trade along the "Belt and Road". On Economic Problems, (7): 78-84(in Chinese).
[7] Hummels, D.(2007). Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization. The journal of economic perspectives, 21(3): 131-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.3.131
[8] Hillberry, R., & Hummels, D. (2008). Trade responses to geographic frictions: A decomposition using micro-data. European Economic Review, 52(3) , 527-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.03.003
[9] Melitz, J. (2003), The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, (6): 1695-1725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467
[10] Wilson, J. S., Mann, C. L., & Otsuki, T. (2003). Trade facilitation and economic development: a new approach to quantifying the impact. The World Bank Economic Review, (3): 367-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhg027
[11] Djankov, S., Freund, C., & Pham, C. S.(2010). Trading on time. Review of Economics and Statistics, (1): 166-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2009.11498
[12] Alberto, P., & John, S. W. (2012). Export performance and trade facilitation reform: Hard and soft Infrastructure. World Development, 40(7): 1295-1307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.002
[13] Yadav, N. (2014). Trade facilitation and economic development: A new approach to quantifying the impact.The International Trade Journal, 28(4): 287-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2014.922040
[14] Halaszovich, T. F., & Aseem, K. (2018). The Impact of distance and national transportation system on FDI and international trade patterns: Results from Asian global value chains. Transport Policy, (4): 35-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.003
[15] González, J. L., & Soresc, S. (2019). Helping SMEs internationalise through trade facilitation. OECD Trade Policy Papers.
[16] Kamal, M. A., Shah, S. H., Jing, W., et al. (2020). Does the quality of institutions in host countries affect the location choice of Chinese OFDI: Evidence from Asia and Africa. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(1): 208-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1610876
[17] Henri, L. F., Groot, H., Linders, G. H., et al. (2004). The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos, 57(1): 103-123. [18] Wu, F., & Yan, X. (2018). Institutional quality and sustainable development of industries' exports: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(11): 1-22． DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00245.x
[19] Andersonje, E., & Van Wincoope, E. (2004). Trade costs. Journal of Economic literature, 42(3): 691-751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051042177649
[20] Araujo, L., Mion, G ., & Ornelas, E. (2016). Institutions and export dynamics. Journal of International Economics, 98: 2-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.08.004
[21] Greckhamer,T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., et al. (2018). Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, (16): 482-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786487
[22] Rihoux, D. B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569
[23] Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration.
[24] Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better casual theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 393-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
[25] Greckhamer, T. (2016). CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries: The configurational impact of country-level institutions. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 793-815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2370
[26] Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2012). What determines Chinese outward FDI? Journal of World Business, 47(1): 26-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.10.017
[27] Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3): 397-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
[28] Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3): 291-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019
[29] Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244
[30] Dwivedi, P., Joshi, A., & Misangyi, V. F. (2018). Gender-inclusive gatekeeping: How (mostly male) predecessors influence the success of female CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 61: 379-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1238
[31] Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., & Furnari, S. (2017). Embracing causal com plexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43: 255-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679252
[32] Li, Y., Vertinsky, I. B., & Li, J. (2014). National distances, international experience, and venture capital investment performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4): 471-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.08.002
[33] Lewellyn, K. B., & Muller-Kahle, M. I. (2022). A configurational exploration of how female and male CEOs influence their compensation. Journal of Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211027225
[34] Witt, M. A., Fainshmidt, S., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Our board, our rules: Nonconformity to global corporate governance norms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(1): 131-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211022726

Research on the path evolution and policy of China's agricultural products export to countries along the Belt and Road

How to Cite