Opportunities and Challenges Driven by the Wave of Technology: A Comparative Empirical Study of Digital Library Management Models in Chinaand the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63944/t9bj.JFEMRKeywords:
Digital library; Management mode; Comparison between China and US; Technology-driven; Information resource sharingAbstract
Under the background of the era when the technological wave drives globalization and informatization, this paper reveals the characteristics and differences of the development of digital libraries in China and the United States by comparing and analyzing the management models of digital libraries in the two countries. The research finds that China's digital libraries take the top-level design led by the government as the core and promote resource integration and equalization of services through national-level projects. The United States, relying on a multi-party collaboration model, emphasizes the two-way drive of technological innovation and user demands. There are significant differences between the two countries in terms of strategic layout, technology application, service innovation, etc., but they also show a trend of mutual learning: China needs to enhance the level of technological autonomy and service refinement, and the United States can refer to China's experience in systematic strategic promotion. This study provides an empirical reference for the optimal development of digital libraries worldwide.
References
[1] Liu Qing, Guo Jiaru. (2023). The Construction of Professional Branch Libraries inUniversity Libraries from a Collaborative Perspective: A Case Study of Harvard University Library. figure The Library, (10), 91-99.
[2] Wang Chenyang, Zhu Yuqi,Chu Jianxun. (2023). Practice and Implications of Research Data Management in Libraries of Ivy League Universities in the United States. Library Academic Research, (03), 43-49.
[3] Sheng Xingjun, Xu Teng. (2023). Research on Information Literacy Education inUniversity Libraries in the Digital Academic Environment: Based on the Number of University Libraries in the United States Taking academic services as an example. Journal of Sichuan Library, (3), 55-62.
[4] Su Fangli, Lv Chenguang, et al. (2023). Research on Digital Humanities Services in University Libraries under the Background of New Liberal Arts Construction - Ji iSchools Research on Libraries of Alliance Universities . Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics and Industry Management (Social Science Edition), 42(2), 86-92.
[5] Shao Yan, Liu Juanjuan, et al. (2023).Modernization Construction and High-Quality Development of University Libraries: A Review of the 2022 University Library Development Forum. Journal of University Libraries, 41(02), 45-50.
[6] Chu Jihua, Chen Yanfang, Liu Houbin. (2023). Exploration and Practice of the Beijing University Library Working Committee in the Construction of a High-Quality Librarian Team. Journal of University Libraries, 41(03), 14-18.
[7] Jiang Yiying, Jiang Yiting. (2023). Research on the Current Situation of Smart Services inLibraries of "Double First-Class" Universities. Library Research and Work, (8), 77-81.
[8] Wang Fengjiao, Dong Beilei. (2023). Research on the Knowledge Ecosystem of Embedded Discipline Services in University Libraries. Library Work and Research, (10), 23-31.
[9] Hu Haiyan. (2023). Research on the Current Situation and Development Strategies of Douyin Short Video Operation in Provincial Public Libraries in China. Library Work and Research, (12), 94-105.
[10] Miao Meijuan, (2021). The Practice and Implications of American Public Libraries in Promoting Generational Integration. Journal of Library Science in China, (3), 113-127.
[11] Zhang Qiyun, Li Chao. (2021). Research on Knowledge Services of Smart Libraries in Universities from the Perspective of Knowledge Production in Smart Society. Library, (9) , 21-27.
[12] Xu Tiancai, Ren Xiaoyu, Xu Shiman, et al. (2023). Research on User Experience Expectations and Construction Strategies for Intelligent Services in University Libraries. Journal of University Libraries, 41(01), 78-86.
[13] Huang Jing. (2020). Institutional Restructuring and Functional Transcendence: The Long-Tail Survival of Interlibrary Loan and Document Delivery Services in American Universities. Journal of University Libraries, 38(04), 47-52.
[14] Library Statistics and Figures:The Nation’s Largest Public Libraries[EB/OL]. (2024). https://libguides.ala.org/librarystatistics/largest-public-libs.
[15] Tella, A. (2023). Application of Artificial Intelligence for Reference Servicesin Academic Libraries: A Global Overview through a Systematic Review ofLiterature.Journal of Library Resource Sharing, 32(1-5), 11-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26915979.2023.2281668
[16] Revathi N., V.Vishwa Mohan. (2022). Paradigm Shift of Library and InformationServices with Special Reference to Mobile Information Services in 21st Century.International Journal of Research in Library Science , (8), 15-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26761/IJRLS.8.1.2022.1492
[17] Fruehan, P., Diana H. (2021). Expanding and improving our library’s virtual chat service: Discovering best practices when demand increases. Information technology and libraries, (8), 40-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i3.13117
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Frontier in Economic and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.