ESG Investment and Financial Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China

Qianwen Lu (Author)

Faculty of Management Science, Dhonburi Rajabhat University, Bangkok,Thailand

Jirapong Ruanggoon (Primary Contact)

Faculty of Management Science, Dhonburi Rajabhat University, Bangkok,Thailand

Keywords:

ESG Investment, Financial Performance, Financing Constraints

Published

02-06-2026

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between ESG performance and financial performance among Chinese listed firms, focusing on nonlinear effects, the mediating role of financing constraints, heterogeneous impacts across industries and firm sizes, and the development of practical ESG guidelines. Using 841 firm-year observations from 137 A-share listed companies during the period 2000–2025, the study employed panel data methods, including fixed-effects regression, mediation analysis, and subgroup analysis, together with expert validation of the proposed guidelines. The results revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship between ESG performance and ROE, indicating an optimal ESG threshold beyond which excessive ESG engagement generated diminishing financial returns. Financing constraints significantly mediated this relationship, as stronger ESG performance improved firms’ access to capital and reduced financing pressure. ESG effects were found to be context-dependent, with stronger positive impacts observed in high environmental impact industries. ESG performance also improved accounting performance among large firms and enhanced market valuation among SMEs. The study further developed evidence-based ESG guidelines for balanced and strategic ESG implementation. These findings contribute to a better understanding of ESG mechanisms in emerging markets and provide practical implications for balancing sustainability objectives and financial performance.

References
  • [1] Yang, L., Liu, X., Wu, Y., & Su, S. (2023). Research on the status and performance of enterprise environmental protection investment in metallurgical industry: Based on the case of Baosteel. In Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management (pp. 240–248). Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3584871.3584906

  • [2] Wang, H., & Wu, J. (2025). ESG input-output mismatch and corporate performance: Evidence from China’s A-share market. China Economic Review, 92, 101876.

  • [3] Handoyo, S., Amrania, G. K. P., & Hasan, A. N. (2026). Assessing the impact of ESG practices on financial performance and market valuation: Heterogeneity analyses across regions, income levels, and industries. Business Strategy & Development, 9(2), e70319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70319

  • [4] Chen, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Industry heterogeneity and the economic consequences of corporate ESG performance for good or bad: A firm value perspective. Sustainability, 16(15), 6506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156506

  • [5] Wu, H., Deng, H., & Gao, X. (2024). Corporate coupling coordination between ESG and financial performance: Evidence from China's listed companies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 107, 107546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107546

  • [6] Xue, Y., Zhang, C., Mentel, G., Mohammed, K. S., Rosak-Szyrocka, J., & Zhao, X. (2025). Impact of ESG rating divergence on corporate resilience: insights from China’s A-share market. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06799-9

  • [7] Li, M. (2025). An Empirical Study of ERP System Adoption Among Chinese Corporate Managers. AU-GSB E-Journal, 18(2), 253.

  • [8] Sheehan, N. T., Vaidyanathan, G., Fox, K. A., & Klassen, M. (2023). Making the invisible, visible: Overcoming barriers to ESG performance with an ESG mindset. Business Horizons, 66(2), 265-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.07.003

  • [9] Tan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68, 101906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906

  • [10] Jiang, F., & Kim, K. A. (2024). Understanding corporate governance in China. The British Accounting Review, 56(5), 101459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101459

  • [11] Xu, Y., & Zhu, N. (2024). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on corporate financial performance in China: Based on the perspective of innovation and financial constraints. Sustainability, 16(8), 3329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083329

  • [12] Gold, N. O., Taib, F. M., & Ma, Y. (2022). Firm-level attributes, industry-specific factors, stakeholder pressure, and country-level attributes: global evidence of what inspires corporate sustainability practices and performance. Sustainability, 14(20), 13222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013222

  • [13] Chang, Y. J., & Lee, B. H. (2022). The impact of ESG activities on firm value: Multi-level analysis of industrial characteristics. Sustainability, 14(21), 14444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114444

  • [14] Bhandari, A., Mishra, S., & Singh, A. (2022). Resource-based view and ESG performance: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132897.

  • [15] Balzano, M., Marzi, G., & Turzo, T. (2025). SMEs and institutional theory: major inroads and opportunities ahead. Management Decision, 63(13), 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2023-0734

PDF
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026)
Section
Article
License

How to Cite

Qianwen Lu, & Jirapong Ruanggoon. (2026). ESG Investment and Financial Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China. Journal of Frontier in Economic and Management Research, 2(2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.63944/gv99.JFEMR