Research on the Institutional Practice of Guangdong–Macao Cooperation over the 26 Years since Macao’s Return to China— On the Implications of Regional Governance under the “One Country, Two Systems” Framework

Yinan Wang (Primary Contact)

Institute for Research on Portuguese-speaking Countries (IROPC), City University of Macau, Taipa 999078, Macau, China

Keywords:

Macao’s return to China, Guangdong–Macao cooperation, Hong Kong–Macao studies, area studies, One Country, Two Systems

Published

31-12-2025

Abstract

Over the past 26 years since Macao’s return to China, the institutional operation of the “One Country, Two Systems” framework in Macao has continued to deepen, with Guangdong–Macao cooperation emerging as a crucial regional pathway for Macao’s integration into the national development system. From the perspective of area studies and Hong Kong–Macao studies, this article conceptualizes Guangdong–Macao cooperation as a concrete form of cross-institutional regional interaction under the “One Country, Two Systems” framework. It systematically examines the evolutionary logic and institutional significance of such cooperation in areas including economic and trade relations, infrastructure connectivity, industrial coordination, and social integration since the handover. The study argues that through functional complementarity and regulatory alignment, Guangdong–Macao cooperation has effectively expanded Macao’s socio-economic development space while preserving a high degree of autonomy and institutional differentiation. This process demonstrates the flexibility and adaptability of the “One Country, Two Systems” framework at the level of regional governance. The experience discussed in this article provides an important case for understanding the role of the Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative Regions in China’s regional development strategies and the long-term operation of the “One Country, Two Systems” framework.

References
  • [1] 谢来风,谭慧芳. 粤港澳大湾区背景下澳门“精准联系”功能的概念、内涵与提升策略[J]. 科技导报,2019,37(23):92-100.

  • [2] 徐枫,李洁. 基于热力学评价模型的粤港澳大湾区区域经济发展质量评估[J]. 科技和产业,2021,21(4):80-86.

  • [3] 马静娴. 粤港澳大湾区产学协同创新网络结构特征及优化对策[J]. 科技和产业,2024,24(22):230-240.

  • [4] 广东海关. 1999—2023年粤澳进出口贸易统计情况[R]. 北京:海关总署,2024-11.

  • [5] 广东省商务厅. 广东与澳门经贸合作发展情况[A]. 广东商务年鉴(2024)[M]. 广州:广东人民出版社,2024.

  • [6] 澳门特别行政区政府统计暨普查局. 对外贸易统计年刊[R]. 澳门,2024.

  • [7] 珠海市人民政府口岸局. 港珠澳大桥珠海口岸通行情况统计[R]. 珠海,2024-10.

  • [8] 广东省公安厅交通管理局. “澳门单牌车北上”政策实施情况通报[R]. 广州,2024-09.

  • [9] 横琴粤澳深度合作区执行委员会. 横琴口岸“粤澳联合一站式”查验模式运行情况[R]. 横琴,2024-03.

  • [10] 国家移民管理局. 横琴口岸通关便利化改革成效[R]. 北京,2024.

  • [11] 广东省发展和改革委员会. 横琴粤澳深度合作区产业发展报告(2024)[R]. 广州,2024.

  • [12] 横琴粤澳深度合作区民生事务局. 澳门青年实习计划实施情况报告[R]. 横琴,2024.

  • [13] 澳门特别行政区政府文化局. 粤澳文化交流项目年度报告[R]. 澳门,2024.

  • [14] 中华人民共和国商务部. 中国对葡语国家经贸合作情况通报[R]. 北京,2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400286827.002

  • [15] 澳门特别行政区政府. 支持澳门全面参与和助力“一带一路”建设的安排[Z]. 澳门,2023.

PDF (Chinese)
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)
Section
文章
License

How to Cite

Yinan Wang. (2025). Research on the Institutional Practice of Guangdong–Macao Cooperation over the 26 Years since Macao’s Return to China— On the Implications of Regional Governance under the “One Country, Two Systems” Framework. Regional and Country Studies, 1(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.63944/fbjd.RCS